Version Zero

From Baltimore Node Wiki
Revision as of 18:50, 4 July 2009 by Abachman (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search

There are lots of proposals floating around, and currently no boundaries on what may be suggested, discussed, or proposed. What would be more beneficial to the group and everyone who is participating is a small set of coherent options to discuss and either adopt, adapt, or set aside.

This is a list of operating and founding guidelines, not suggestions for projects or particular uses of any given space. This list is also exclusive of the space search discussion, this would still be version zero no matter where we end up.

I (Abachman) suggest we codify the current proposal on the table as being something like the following:

  1. The budget target for space, utilities, and insurance is $800 per month, maximum. That can be considered the maximum allowable non-optional burn rate. The amount we would have to pay to not lose the space. This number is based on $600 rent + $150 avg. utilities (could be more some months, which is why we need a buffer) + $25 insurance (Rent, Utilities, Insurance: RUI). Sherwin suggested that theft and liability insurance (which would be required by the lease) could be as little as $100 a year. I suggest $25 as a reasonable approximation (within an order of magnitude), regardless of final location.

    Anything outside the scope of this amount is not considered version zero, and should be discussed elsewhere.
  1. The total budget for the organization should separate line items for non-optional and optional quantities. The number based on RUI would be the top priority and should be achievable based solely on membership dues collection. All other monthly income after initial donation drives (see below) would be put towards Events, Equipment, and Projects (EEP).
  1. Signing a lease would be dependent on financial commitments for the support of the space from each of the founding members of the organization. A situation in which any single member is financially liable for the whole cost is unacceptable (unless we have a volunteer?). The amount required from each founding member would be sliding based on need and personal ability, but must be agreed upon before the lease is signed and must be for the term of the lease. This amount constitutes the non-optional quantity required to keep the space. If it can't be met, the space closes.
  1. Upon the acceptance of the above outline and the immanent acquisition of a space, we would start three donation drives:
    1. The Founders Grant. This would be a one time funding drive intended to build up a buffer of at least three months RUI. Based on the back of the envelope calculation above, that'd be about 800 * 3 = 2400, but would vary based on the final RUI calculation.
    1. Equipment & Furnishings: in order to fill the space with fun things to do for as many people as possible, we need tools, equipment, parts, scrap, raw materials, and furnishings. The easiest way to do this is free, so we set out to solicit the donation of physical matériel. Stuff that is available on loan would come later and through separate channels, this donation drive would be things that people are willing to part permanently.
    1. EEP Grant. This would ideally come after A. and would be the open ended drive to collect funding for events, equipment, and projects; and everything EEP entails.
  1. We choose a key-holding membership cap based on the space available. It's reasonable that Load of Fun could support a membership of 25. Evenly spreading RUI expense across 25 members would put monthly dues at $40. The "what is a member" and membership benefits discussion will have to be another thread.
  1. We adopt a "space first" attitude as far as the founding members are concerned. It was mentioned briefly at the second organizational meeting that the founding members are in this phase of the discussion to act as janitors, administrators, and midwives for the organizational birthing process. That suggestion still stands. The items proposed here are independent of projects, location searching, and the future of Baltimore Node as a loose confederation of like-minded technological enthusiasts.