Membership Agreement - Revision history

Madmaze: This update was agreed upon during the 2015 Annual Meeting.

2015-04-06T12:06:50Z

This update was agreed upon during the 2015 Annual Meeting.

Abachman at 20:53, 16 September 2012

2012-09-16T20:53:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:53, 16 September 2012
Line 43:		Line 43:

	== Intellectual Property ==		== Intellectual Property ==
	Baltimore Node makes no claim to any intellectual property created by Baltimore Node members or created using Baltimore Node resources or facilities. Members are strongly encouraged, but not required, to make freely available under an open source license approved by Open Source Initiative (OSI) or a Creative Commons (CC) license, any documentation, schematics, plans, and/or source code created using Baltimore Node resources or facilities. Any member working on a project that is NOT licensed under an OSI approved or CC license ~~must~~ inform collaborating members of the project's licensing terms BEFORE collaborating.		Baltimore Node makes no claim to any intellectual property created by Baltimore Node members or created using Baltimore Node resources or facilities. Members are strongly encouraged, but not required, to make freely available under an open source license approved by Open Source Initiative (OSI) or a Creative Commons (CC) license, any documentation, schematics, plans, and/or source code created using Baltimore Node resources or facilities. Any member working on a project that is NOT licensed under an OSI approved or CC license should inform collaborating members of the project's licensing terms BEFORE collaborating.

Jonlesser: Protected "Membership Agreement": 15 members have signed this version. ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))

2009-07-28T06:07:10Z

Protected "Membership Agreement": 15 members have signed this version. ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:07, 28 July 2009
(No difference)

Jonlesser: /* Key Access */

2009-07-24T21:06:21Z

Key Access

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:06, 24 July 2009
Line 24:		Line 24:
	________<br/>		________<br/>
	Initials		Initials

	* Are we not planning on having a trial period before giving access to keys? Are using the approval of membership as the sign of trust to grant access to keys? [[User:Mehuman\|Mehuman]] 18:51, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
	** I think that any member should have a right to a key. I built inefficiencies into the [[Membership Process]] so that people can't just show up, pay $50, and get a key in one day. Pumping station one is even more lax, "To become a new member, you would just need to make your first payment here, show up at a meeting to sign a release form, and you'll get a key."[http://pumpingstationone.org/blog/members.html]. HacDC is not much different. -[[User:Jonlesser\|Jonlesser]] 19:17, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
	*** I'm cool with that. [[User:Mehuman\|Mehuman]] 19:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

	== Release of Liability ==		== Release of Liability ==

Jonlesser: /* Key Access */

2009-07-23T04:33:01Z

Key Access

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:33, 23 July 2009
Line 19:		Line 19:

	== Key Access ==		== Key Access ==
	Keys provide members with 24/7 access to the space. The Load of Fun space uses high security keys that can only be duplicated by the landlord. Members may request ~~at any time by~~ providing a valid photo ID (driver's license, passport, etc.) and paying for the cost of key duplication. There will be a $100 fee for lost keys.		Keys provide members with 24/7 access to the space. The Load of Fun space uses high security keys that can only be duplicated by the landlord. Members may request a key providing a valid photo ID (driver's license, passport, etc.) and paying for the cost of key duplication. There will be a $100 fee for lost keys.

Mehuman: /* Key Access */

2009-07-18T19:57:57Z

Key Access

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:57, 18 July 2009
Line 27:		Line 27:
	* Are we not planning on having a trial period before giving access to keys? Are using the approval of membership as the sign of trust to grant access to keys? [[User:Mehuman\|Mehuman]] 18:51, 18 July 2009 (UTC)		* Are we not planning on having a trial period before giving access to keys? Are using the approval of membership as the sign of trust to grant access to keys? [[User:Mehuman\|Mehuman]] 18:51, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
	** I think that any member should have a right to a key. I built inefficiencies into the [[Membership Process]] so that people can't just show up, pay $50, and get a key in one day. Pumping station one is even more lax, "To become a new member, you would just need to make your first payment here, show up at a meeting to sign a release form, and you'll get a key."[http://pumpingstationone.org/blog/members.html]. HacDC is not much different. -[[User:Jonlesser\|Jonlesser]] 19:17, 18 July 2009 (UTC)		** I think that any member should have a right to a key. I built inefficiencies into the [[Membership Process]] so that people can't just show up, pay $50, and get a key in one day. Pumping station one is even more lax, "To become a new member, you would just need to make your first payment here, show up at a meeting to sign a release form, and you'll get a key."[http://pumpingstationone.org/blog/members.html]. HacDC is not much different. -[[User:Jonlesser\|Jonlesser]] 19:17, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
			*** I'm cool with that. [[User:Mehuman\|Mehuman]] 19:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

	== Release of Liability ==		== Release of Liability ==

Jonlesser: /* Key Access */

2009-07-18T19:17:16Z

Key Access

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:17, 18 July 2009
Line 26:		Line 26:

	* Are we not planning on having a trial period before giving access to keys? Are using the approval of membership as the sign of trust to grant access to keys? [[User:Mehuman\|Mehuman]] 18:51, 18 July 2009 (UTC)		* Are we not planning on having a trial period before giving access to keys? Are using the approval of membership as the sign of trust to grant access to keys? [[User:Mehuman\|Mehuman]] 18:51, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
	** I think that any member should have a right to a key. I built inefficiencies into the [[Membership Process]] so that people can't just show up, pay $50, and get a key in one day. Pumping station one is even more lax, "To become a new member, you would just need to make your first payment here, show up at a meeting to sign a release form, and you'll get a key."[http://pumpingstationone.org/blog/members.html]. HacDC is not much different.		** I think that any member should have a right to a key. I built inefficiencies into the [[Membership Process]] so that people can't just show up, pay $50, and get a key in one day. Pumping station one is even more lax, "To become a new member, you would just need to make your first payment here, show up at a meeting to sign a release form, and you'll get a key."[http://pumpingstationone.org/blog/members.html]. HacDC is not much different. -[[User:Jonlesser\|Jonlesser]] 19:17, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

	== Release of Liability ==		== Release of Liability ==

Jonlesser: /* Key Access */

2009-07-18T19:17:02Z

Key Access

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:17, 18 July 2009
Line 26:		Line 26:

	* Are we not planning on having a trial period before giving access to keys? Are using the approval of membership as the sign of trust to grant access to keys? [[User:Mehuman\|Mehuman]] 18:51, 18 July 2009 (UTC)		* Are we not planning on having a trial period before giving access to keys? Are using the approval of membership as the sign of trust to grant access to keys? [[User:Mehuman\|Mehuman]] 18:51, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
			** I think that any member should have a right to a key. I built inefficiencies into the [[Membership Process]] so that people can't just show up, pay $50, and get a key in one day. Pumping station one is even more lax, "To become a new member, you would just need to make your first payment here, show up at a meeting to sign a release form, and you'll get a key."[http://pumpingstationone.org/blog/members.html]. HacDC is not much different.

	== Release of Liability ==		== Release of Liability ==

Mehuman: /* Key Access */

2009-07-18T18:51:35Z

Key Access

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:51, 18 July 2009
Line 24:		Line 24:
	________<br/>		________<br/>
	Initials		Initials

			* Are we not planning on having a trial period before giving access to keys? Are using the approval of membership as the sign of trust to grant access to keys? [[User:Mehuman\|Mehuman]] 18:51, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

	== Release of Liability ==		== Release of Liability ==

Jonlesser: /* Disclaimer */ adding parent or guardian sig

2009-07-18T18:19:40Z

Disclaimer: adding parent or guardian sig

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:19, 18 July 2009
Line 53:		Line 53:

	<br/><br/><br/>		<br/><br/><br/>
	~~________________________________________~~<br/>		_____________________________________________________<br/>
	~~Printed name~~ of new member		Name of new member

	<br/><br/>		<br/><br/>
	~~________________________________________~~<br/>		_____________________________________________________<br/>
	Signature of new member		Signature of new member                                             Date

			<br/><br/>
			_____________________________________________________<br/>
			Name of parent or guardian if member is less than 18 years old

			<br/><br/>
			_____________________________________________________<br/>
			Signature of parent of guardian                                     Date